문제 은행 · 기초 수학 · 공통수학2 · 집합과 명제

명제의 증명과 절대부등식

먼저 혼자 풀어 보고, 풀이로 확인한 다음, 아래 「한 번 더」 문제로 이어서 연습하세요.

Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 3.3절 · 1a번영어 원문

This exercise is intended to provide another rationale as to why a proof by contradiction works. Suppose that we are trying to prove that a statement PP is true. Instead of proving this statement, assume that we prove that the conditional statement “If ¬P\neg P, then CC” is true, where CC is some contradiction. Recall that a contradiction is a statement that is always false.

In symbols, write a statement that is a disjunction and that is logically equivalent to ¬P→C\neg P \to C.

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

P∨CP \vee C

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 3.3절 · 11a번영어 원문

Justify your conclusion for each of the following.

Is the base 2 logarithm of 32, log⁡2(32)\log_2 (32), a rational number or an irrational number?

다 풀었으면 정답 확인

Recall that log⁡2(32)\log _2 (32) is the real number aa such that 2a=322^a = 32. That is, a=log⁡2(32)a = \log _2 (32) means that 2a=322^a = 32. If we assume that aa is rational, then there exist integers mm and nn, with n≠0n \ne 0, such that a=mna = \dfrac{m}{n}.

이 문제로 이어서 풀기
# 명제의 증명과 절대부등식증명·논술자동 분류

「명제의 증명과 절대부등식」 문제 목록으로