문제 은행 · 기초 수학 · 공통수학2 · 집합과 명제

명제와 조건

명제의 참·거짓과 조건의 진리집합, 역·이·대우를 다룬다

유형·난이도는 우리말 풀이가 붙은 문제는 선생님이 정했고, 나머지는 자동 분류라 다를 수 있어요. 난이도가 정해지지 않은 문제는 난이도로 거를 때 빠집니다.

144문제 · 3 / 8쪽

41.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 6f번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem which can be proven using calculus or precalculus mathematics. For this theorem, aa, bb, and cc are real numbers.

  • Theorem If ff is a quadratic function of the form f(x)=ax2+bx+cf\left( x \right) = ax^2 + bx + c and a<0a \lt 0, then the function ff has a maximum value when x=−b2ax = \dfrac{{ - b}}{{2a}}.

Using only this theorem, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

F(x)=−x4+x3+9F\left( x \right) = - x^4 + x^3 + 9

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 2.1절
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
42.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 7a번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem which can be proven using the quadratic formula. For this theorem, aa, bb, and cc are real numbers.

  • Theorem If ff is a quadratic function of the form f(x)=ax2+bx+cf\left( x \right) = ax^2 + bx + c and ac<0ac \lt 0, then the function ff has two xx-intercepts.

Using only this theorem, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

g(x)=−8x2+5x−2g\left( x \right) = - 8x^2 + 5x - 2

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 1g번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
43.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 7b번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem which can be proven using the quadratic formula. For this theorem, aa, bb, and cc are real numbers.

  • Theorem If ff is a quadratic function of the form f(x)=ax2+bx+cf\left( x \right) = ax^2 + bx + c and ac<0ac \lt 0, then the function ff has two xx-intercepts.

Using only this theorem, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

h(x)=−13x2+3xh\left( x \right) = - \dfrac{1}{3}x^2 + 3x

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 1e번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
44.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 7c번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem which can be proven using the quadratic formula. For this theorem, aa, bb, and cc are real numbers.

  • Theorem If ff is a quadratic function of the form f(x)=ax2+bx+cf\left( x \right) = ax^2 + bx + c and ac<0ac \lt 0, then the function ff has two xx-intercepts.

Using only this theorem, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

k(x)=8x2−5x−7k\left( x \right) = 8x^2 - 5x - 7

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 2.4절 · 2f번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
45.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 7d번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem which can be proven using the quadratic formula. For this theorem, aa, bb, and cc are real numbers.

  • Theorem If ff is a quadratic function of the form f(x)=ax2+bx+cf\left( x \right) = ax^2 + bx + c and ac<0ac \lt 0, then the function ff has two xx-intercepts.

Using only this theorem, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

j(x)=−7199x2+210j\left( x \right) = - \dfrac{{71}}{{99}}x^2 + 210

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 3d번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
46.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 7e번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem which can be proven using the quadratic formula. For this theorem, aa, bb, and cc are real numbers.

  • Theorem If ff is a quadratic function of the form f(x)=ax2+bx+cf\left( x \right) = ax^2 + bx + c and ac<0ac \lt 0, then the function ff has two xx-intercepts.

Using only this theorem, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

f(x)=−4x2−3x+7f\left( x \right) = - 4x^2 - 3x + 7

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 2.4절 · 2b번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
47.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 7f번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem which can be proven using the quadratic formula. For this theorem, aa, bb, and cc are real numbers.

  • Theorem If ff is a quadratic function of the form f(x)=ax2+bx+cf\left( x \right) = ax^2 + bx + c and ac<0ac \lt 0, then the function ff has two xx-intercepts.

Using only this theorem, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

F(x)=−x4+x3+9F\left( x \right) = - x^4 + x^3 + 9

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 2.4절
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
48.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 8a번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem about certain cubic equations. For this theorem, bb represents a real number.

  • Theorem A If ff is a cubic function of the form f(x)=x3−x+bf(x) = x^3 - x + b and b>1b > 1, then the function ff has exactly one xx-intercept.

Following is another theorem about xx-intercepts of functions:

  • Theorem B If ff and gg are functions with g(x)=k⋅f(x)g(x) = k \cdot f(x), where kk is a nonzero real number, then ff and gg have exactly the same xx-intercepts.

Using only these two theorems and some simple algebraic manipulations, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

f(x)=x3−x+7f(x) = x^3 - x + 7

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
49.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 8b번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem about certain cubic equations. For this theorem, bb represents a real number.

  • Theorem A If ff is a cubic function of the form f(x)=x3−x+bf(x) = x^3 - x + b and b>1b > 1, then the function ff has exactly one xx-intercept.

Following is another theorem about xx-intercepts of functions:

  • Theorem B If ff and gg are functions with g(x)=k⋅f(x)g(x) = k \cdot f(x), where kk is a nonzero real number, then ff and gg have exactly the same xx-intercepts.

Using only these two theorems and some simple algebraic manipulations, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

g(x)=x3+x+7g(x) = x^3 + x + 7

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 2.4절 · 6a번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
50.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 8c번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem about certain cubic equations. For this theorem, bb represents a real number.

  • Theorem A If ff is a cubic function of the form f(x)=x3−x+bf(x) = x^3 - x + b and b>1b > 1, then the function ff has exactly one xx-intercept.

Following is another theorem about xx-intercepts of functions:

  • Theorem B If ff and gg are functions with g(x)=k⋅f(x)g(x) = k \cdot f(x), where kk is a nonzero real number, then ff and gg have exactly the same xx-intercepts.

Using only these two theorems and some simple algebraic manipulations, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

h(x)=−x3+x−5h(x) = -x^3 + x - 5

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 2e번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
51.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 8d번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem about certain cubic equations. For this theorem, bb represents a real number.

  • Theorem A If ff is a cubic function of the form f(x)=x3−x+bf(x) = x^3 - x + b and b>1b > 1, then the function ff has exactly one xx-intercept.

Following is another theorem about xx-intercepts of functions:

  • Theorem B If ff and gg are functions with g(x)=k⋅f(x)g(x) = k \cdot f(x), where kk is a nonzero real number, then ff and gg have exactly the same xx-intercepts.

Using only these two theorems and some simple algebraic manipulations, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

k(x)=2x3+2x+3k(x) = 2x^3 + 2x + 3

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 2.4절 · 6e번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
52.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 8e번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem about certain cubic equations. For this theorem, bb represents a real number.

  • Theorem A If ff is a cubic function of the form f(x)=x3−x+bf(x) = x^3 - x + b and b>1b > 1, then the function ff has exactly one xx-intercept.

Following is another theorem about xx-intercepts of functions:

  • Theorem B If ff and gg are functions with g(x)=k⋅f(x)g(x) = k \cdot f(x), where kk is a nonzero real number, then ff and gg have exactly the same xx-intercepts.

Using only these two theorems and some simple algebraic manipulations, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

r(x)=x4−x+11r(x) = x^4 - x + 11

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 9g번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
53.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 8f번영어 원문

Following is a statement of a theorem about certain cubic equations. For this theorem, bb represents a real number.

  • Theorem A If ff is a cubic function of the form f(x)=x3−x+bf(x) = x^3 - x + b and b>1b > 1, then the function ff has exactly one xx-intercept.

Following is another theorem about xx-intercepts of functions:

  • Theorem B If ff and gg are functions with g(x)=k⋅f(x)g(x) = k \cdot f(x), where kk is a nonzero real number, then ff and gg have exactly the same xx-intercepts.

Using only these two theorems and some simple algebraic manipulations, what can be concluded about the functions given by the following formulas?

F(x)=2x3−2x+7F(x) = 2x^3 - 2x + 7

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
54.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 9a번영어 원문

Using what you learned in this section, answer the following.

Is the set of natural numbers closed under division?

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
55.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 9b번영어 원문

Using what you learned in this section, answer the following.

Is the set of rational numbers closed under division?

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

The set of rational numbers is not closed under division since division by zero is not defined.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 2c번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
56.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 9c번영어 원문

Using what you learned in this section, answer the following.

Is the set of nonzero rational numbers closed under division?

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
57.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 9d번영어 원문

Using what you learned in this section, answer the following.

Is the set of positive rational numbers closed under division?

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

The set of positive rational numbers is closed under division.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 2e번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
58.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 9e번영어 원문

Using what you learned in this section, answer the following.

Is the set of positive real numbers closed under subtraction?

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

The set of positive real numbers is not closed under subtraction.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 2d번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
59.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 9f번영어 원문

Using what you learned in this section, answer the following.

Is the set of negative rational numbers closed under division?

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

The set of negative rational numbers is not closed under division.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 9g번
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류
60.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 1.1절 · 9g번영어 원문

Using what you learned in this section, answer the following.

Is the set of negative integers closed under addition?

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)
# 명제와 조건계산자동 분류