문제 은행 · 기초 수학 · 대수 · 수열

수열 전체 문제

이 단원의 모든 연습문제입니다. 소단원으로 좁혀 보려면 아래 꼬리표를 누르세요.

유형·난이도는 우리말 풀이가 붙은 문제는 선생님이 정했고, 나머지는 자동 분류라 다를 수 있어요. 난이도가 정해지지 않은 문제는 난이도로 거를 때 빠집니다.

45문제 · 2 / 3쪽

21.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 8번영어 원문

Can each natural number greater than or equal to 4 be written as the sum of at least two natural numbers, each of which is a 2 or a 3? Justify your conclusion. For example, 7=2+2+37 = 2 + 2 + 3, and 17=2+2+2+2+3+3+317 = 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 3.

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

Let P(n)P( n ) be, “The natural number nn can be written as a sum of natural numbers, each of which is a 2 or a 3.” Verify that P(4),P(5),P(6)P( 4 ), P( 5 ), P( 6 ), and P(7)P( 7 ) are true. To use the Second Principle of Mathematical Induction, assume that k∈N,k≥5k \in \mathbb{N}, k \geq 5 and that P(4),P(5),…,P(k)P( 4 ), P( 5 ), \ldots , P( k ) are true. Then notice that

k+1=(k−1)+2k + 1 = ( {k - 1} ) + 2

. Since k−1≥4k - 1 \geq 4, we have assumed that P(k−1)P( {k - 1} ) is true. This means that (k−1)(k-1) can be written as a sum of natural numbers, each of which is a 2 or a 3. Since k+1=(k−1)+2k + 1 = (k - 1) + 2, we can conclude that (k+1)(k+1) can be written as a sum of natural numbers, each of which is a 2 or a 3. This completes the proof of the inductive step.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 5번
# 수학적 귀납법증명·논술자동 분류
22.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 9번영어 원문

Can each natural number greater than or equal to 6 be written as the sum of at least two natural numbers, each of which is a 2 or a 5? Justify your conclusion. For example, 6=2+2+26 = 2 + 2 + 2, 9=2+2+59 = 2 + 2 + 5, and 17=2+5+5+517 = 2 + 5 + 5 + 5.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 8번
# 수학적 귀납법증명·논술자동 분류
23.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 10번영어 원문

Use mathematical induction to prove the following proposition:

Let

x

be a real number with

x > 0

. Then for each natural number

n

with

n \geq 2

,

\left( {1 + x} \right)^n > 1 + nx

.

Explain where the assumption that x>0x > 0 was used in the proof.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 8번
# 수학적 귀납법증명·논술자동 분류
24.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 11번영어 원문

Prove that for each odd natural number nn with n≥3n \geq 3,

(1+12)(1−13)(1+14)⋯(1+(−1)nn)=1\left( {1 + \frac{1}{2}} \right) \left( {1 - \frac{1}{3}} \right) \left( {1 + \frac{1}{4}} \right) \cdots \left( {1 + \frac{{\left( { - 1} \right)^n }}{n}} \right) = 1

.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절
# 수학적 귀납법증명·논술자동 분류
25.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 12번영어 원문

Prove that for each natural number nn, any set with nn elements has n(n−1)2\dfrac{n \left( {n-1} \right)}{2} two-element subsets.

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

Let P(n)P ( n ) be, “Any set with nn elements has n(n−1)2\dfrac{n ( n - 1 )}{2} 2-element subsets.” P(1)P ( 1 ) is true since any set with only one element has no 2-element subsets. Let k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N} and assume that P(k)P ( k ) is true. This means that any set with kk elements has k(k−1)2\dfrac{k ( k - 1 )}{2} 2-element subsets. Let AA be a set with k+1k + 1 elements, and let x∈Ax \in A. Now use the inductive hypothesis on the set A−{x}A - \left\{ x \right\}, and determine how the 2-element subsets of AA are related to the set A−{x}A - \left\{ x \right\}.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.1절 · 3a번
# 수학적 귀납법증명·논술자동 분류
26.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 13a번영어 원문

Prove or disprove each of the following propositions:

For each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, 11⋅2+12⋅3+⋯+1n(n+1)=nn+1\dfrac{1}{1 \cdot 2} + \dfrac{1}{2 \cdot 3} + \cdots + \dfrac{1}{n (n + 1 )} = \dfrac{n}{n+1}.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절
# 수학적 귀납법증명·논술자동 분류
27.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 13b번영어 원문

Prove or disprove each of the following propositions:

For each natural number nn with n≥3n \geq 3,

13⋅4+14⋅5+⋯+1n(n+1)=n−23n+3\frac{1}{3 \cdot 4} + \frac{1}{4 \cdot 5} + \cdots + \frac{1}{n (n + 1 )} = \frac{n-2}{3n + 3}

.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절
# 수학적 귀납법증명·논술자동 분류
28.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.2절 · 13c번영어 원문

Prove or disprove each of the following propositions:

For each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, 1⋅2+2⋅3+3⋅4+⋯+n(n+1)=n(n+1)(n+2)31 \cdot 2 + 2 \cdot 3 + 3 \cdot 4 + \cdots + n (n + 1 ) = \dfrac{n (n + 1 ) (n + 2 )}{3}.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.1절 · 14번
# 수학적 귀납법증명·논술자동 분류
29.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 1번영어 원문

For the sequence a0,a1,a2,…,an,…a_{0}, a_1 ,a_2 , \ldots , a_n , \ldots , assume that a0=1a_0 = 1 and that for each n∈N∪{0}n \in \mathbb{N} \cup \left\{ 0 \right\}, an+1=(n+1)ana_{n + 1} = \left( {n + 1} \right)a_n. Use mathematical induction to prove that for each n∈N∪{0}n \in \mathbb{N} \cup \left\{ 0 \right\}, an=n!a_n = n!.

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

Let P(n)P(n) be an=n!a_n = n!. Since a0=1a_0 = 1 and 0!=10 ! = 1, we see that P(0)P(0) is true. For the inductive step, we assume that k∈N∪{0}k \in \mathbb{N} \cup \{0\} and that P(k)P(k) is true or that ak=k!a_k = k!.

ak+1=(k+1)ak=(k+1)k!=(k+1)!\begin{aligned}a_{k+1} & = \left( k + 1 \right)a_k \\ & = \left( k + 1 \right) k! \\ & = \left( k + 1 \right)!\end{aligned}

. This proves the inductive step that if P(k)P(k) is true, then P(k+1)P(k+1) is true.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기OpenStax Algebra and Trigonometry · 13.1절 · 55번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
30.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 2a번영어 원문

Assume that f1,f2,…,fn,…f_1 ,f_2 , \ldots ,f_n , \ldots are the Fibonacci numbers. Prove each of the following:

For each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, f4nf_{4n} is a multiple of 3.

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

Let P(n)P( n ) be, “f4nf_{4n} is a multiple of 3.” Since f4=3f_4 = 3, P(1)P( 1 ) is true. If P(k)P( k ) is true, then there exists an integer mm such that f4k=3mf_{4k} = 3m. We now need to prove that P(k+1)P(k+1) is true or that f4(k+1)f_{4(k+1)} is a multiple of 3. We use the following:

f4(k+1)=f4k+4=f4k+3+f4k+2=(f4k+2+f4k+1)+(f4k+1+f4k)=f4k+2+2f4k+1+f4k=(f4k+1+f4k)+2f4k+1+f4k=3f4k+1+2f4k\begin{aligned}f_{4 \left( k + 1 \right)} & = f_{4k + 4} \\ & = f_{4k+3} + f_{4k+2} \\ & = \left( f_{4k+2} + f_{4k+1} \right) + \left( f_{4k+1} + f_{4k} \right) \\ & = f_{4k+2} + 2 f_{4k+1} + f_{4k} \\ & = \left( f_{4k+1} + f_{4k} \right) + 2 f_{4k+1} + f_{4k} \\ & = 3f_{4k + 1} + 2f_{4k}\end{aligned}

We now use the assumption that f4k=3mf_{4k} = 3m and the last equation to obtain f4(k+1)=3f4k+1+2⋅3mf_{4(k+1)} = 3f_{4k + 1} + 2\cdot 3m and hence, f4(k+1)=3(f4k+1+2m)f_{4(k+1)} = 3 \left( f_{4k +1} + 2m \right). Therefore, f4(k+1)f_{4(k+1)} is a multiple of 3 and this completes the proof of the inductive step.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 2c번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
31.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 2b번영어 원문

Assume that f1,f2,…,fn,…f_1 ,f_2 , \ldots ,f_n , \ldots are the Fibonacci numbers. Prove each of the following:

For each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, f5nf_{5n} is a multiple of 5.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 13a번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
32.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 2c번영어 원문

Assume that f1,f2,…,fn,…f_1 ,f_2 , \ldots ,f_n , \ldots are the Fibonacci numbers. Prove each of the following:

For each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N} with n≥2n \geq 2, f1+f2+⋯+fn−1=fn+1−1f_1 + f_2 + \cdots + f_{n - 1} = f_{n + 1} - 1.

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

Let P(n)P( n ) be, “f1+f2+⋯+fn−1=fn+1−1f_1 + f_2 + \cdots + f_{n - 1} = f_{n + 1} - 1.” Since f1=f3−1f_1 = f_3 - 1, P(2)P ( 2 ) is true. For k≥2k \geq 2, if P(k)P ( k ) is true, then f1+f2+⋯+fk−1=fk+1−1f_1 + f_2 + \cdots + f_{k - 1} = f_{k + 1} - 1. Then

(f1+f2+⋯+fk−1)+fk=(fk+1−1)+fk=(fk+1+fk)−1=fk+2−1\begin{aligned}\left( f_1 + f_2 + \cdots + f_{k - 1} \right) + f_k & = \left( f_{k + 1} - 1 \right) + f_k \\ & = \left( f_{k+1} + f_k \right) - 1 \\ & = f_{k+2} - 1\end{aligned}

. This proves that if P(k)P \left( k \right) is true, then P(k+1)P \left( k + 1\right) is true.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 9b번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
33.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 2d번영어 원문

Assume that f1,f2,…,fn,…f_1 ,f_2 , \ldots ,f_n , \ldots are the Fibonacci numbers. Prove each of the following:

For each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, f1+f3+⋯+f2n−1=f2nf_1 + f_3 + \cdots + f_{2n - 1} = f_{2n}.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기OpenStax Algebra and Trigonometry · 13.2절 · 31번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
34.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 2e번영어 원문

Assume that f1,f2,…,fn,…f_1 ,f_2 , \ldots ,f_n , \ldots are the Fibonacci numbers. Prove each of the following:

For each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, f2+f4+⋯+f2n=f2n+1−1f_2 + f_4 + \cdots + f_{2n} = f_{2n + 1} - 1.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 2c번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
35.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 2f번영어 원문

Assume that f1,f2,…,fn,…f_1 ,f_2 , \ldots ,f_n , \ldots are the Fibonacci numbers. Prove each of the following:

For each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, f12+f22+⋯+fn2=fnfn+1f_1^2 + f_2^2 + \cdots + f_n^2 = f_n f_{n + 1}.

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

Let P(n)P( n ) be, “f12+f22+⋯+fn2=fnfn+1f_1^2 + f_2^2 + \cdots + f_n^2 = f_n f_{n + 1}.” For the basis step, we notice that f12=1f_1^2 = 1 and f1⋅f2=1f_1 \cdot f_2 = 1 and hence, P(1)P(1) is true. For the inductive step, we need to prove that if P(k)P(k) is true, then P(k+1)P(k+1) is true. That is, we need to prove that if f12+f22+⋯+fk2=fkfk+1f_1^2 + f_2^2 + \cdots + f_k^2 = f_k f_{k + 1}, then f12+f22+⋯+fk2+fk+12=fk+1fk+2f_1^2 + f_2^2 + \cdots + f_k^2 + f_{k+1}^2 = f_{k+1} f_{k + 2}. To do this, we can use

(f12+f22+⋯+fk2)+fk+12=fkfk+1+fk+12f12+f22+⋯+fk2+fk+12=fk+1(fk+fk+1)=fk+1fk+2\begin{aligned}\left( f_1^2 + f_2^2 + \cdots + f_k^2 \right) + f_{k+1}^2 & = f_k f_{k + 1} + f_{k+1}^2 \\ f_1^2 + f_2^2 + \cdots + f_k^2 + f_{k+1}^2 & = f_{k+1} \left( f_k + f_{k+1} \right) \\ & = f_{k+1} f_{k+2}\end{aligned}

.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 1번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
36.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 4a번영어 원문

The quadratic formula can be used to show that α=1+52\alpha = \dfrac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2} and β=1−52\beta = \dfrac{1 - \sqrt{5}}{2} are the two real number solutions of the quadratic equation x2−x−1=0x^2 - x - 1 = 0. Notice that this implies that

α2=α+1, and β2=β+1\begin{aligned}\alpha^2 & = \alpha + 1, \text{ and } \\ \beta^2 & = \beta + 1\end{aligned}

. It may be surprising to find out that these two irrational numbers are closely related to the Fibonacci numbers.

Verify that f1=α1−β1α−βf_1 = \dfrac{\alpha^1 - \beta^1}{\alpha - \beta} and that f2=α2−β2α−βf_2 = \dfrac{\alpha^2 - \beta^2}{\alpha - \beta}.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기OpenStax Algebra and Trigonometry · 13.2절 · 33번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
37.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 4c번영어 원문

The quadratic formula can be used to show that α=1+52\alpha = \dfrac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2} and β=1−52\beta = \dfrac{1 - \sqrt{5}}{2} are the two real number solutions of the quadratic equation x2−x−1=0x^2 - x - 1 = 0. Notice that this implies that

α2=α+1, and β2=β+1\begin{aligned}\alpha^2 & = \alpha + 1, \text{ and } \\ \beta^2 & = \beta + 1\end{aligned}

. It may be surprising to find out that these two irrational numbers are closely related to the Fibonacci numbers.

Use induction to prove that for each natural number nn, if α=1+52\alpha = \dfrac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2} and β=1−52\beta = \dfrac{1 - \sqrt{5}}{2}, then fn=αn−βnα−βf_n = \dfrac{\alpha^n - \beta^n}{\alpha - \beta}.

This formula for the nthn^{th} Fibonacci number is known as Binet's formula,

named after the French mathematician Jacques Binet (1786 — 1856).

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 18a번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
38.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 11번영어 원문

For the sequence a1,a2,…,an,…a_1 ,a_2 , \ldots ,a_n , \ldots , assume that a1=1a_1 = 1, a2=5a_2 = 5, and that for each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N} with n≥2n\geq 2, an+1=an+2an−1a_{n + 1} = a_n + 2a_{n-1}. Prove that for each natural number nn, an=2n+(−1)na_n = 2^n + (-1)^n.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기OpenStax Algebra and Trigonometry · 13.3절 · 23번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
39.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 12b번영어 원문

For the sequence a1,a2,…,an,…a_1 ,a_2 , \ldots ,a_n , \ldots , assume that a1=1a_1 = 1 and that for each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, an+1=5+ana_{n + 1} = \sqrt {5 + a_n }.

Prove that for each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, an<3a_n \lt 3.

정답·풀이 보기 (영어 원문)

Let P(n)P( n ) be, “an<3a_n \lt 3.” Since a1=1a_1 = 1, P(1)P( 1 ) is true. For k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N}, if P(k)P( k ) is true, then ak<3a_k \lt 3. Now

ak+1=5+aka_{k+1} = \sqrt{5 + a_k}

. Since ak<3a_k \lt 3, this implies that ak+1<8a_{k+1} \lt \sqrt{8} and hence, ak+1<3a_{k+1} \lt 3. This proves that if P(k)P \left( k \right) is true, then P(k+1)P \left( k + 1\right) is true.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 14a번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류
40.Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 14b번영어 원문

For the sequence a1,a2,…,an,…a_1 ,a_2 , \ldots ,a_n , \ldots , assume that a1=1a_1 = 1, a2=1a_2 = 1, and that for each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, an+2=12(an+1+2an)a_{n + 2} = \dfrac{1}{2}\left( {a_{n + 1} + \dfrac{2}{{a_n }}} \right).

Prove that for each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, 1≤an≤21 \leq a_n \leq 2.

원본 교재에 이 문제의 정답은 실려 있지 않습니다.

한 번 더 — 비슷한 문제 풀기Sundstrom, Mathematical Reasoning · 4.3절 · 9a번
# 수열의 귀납적 정의증명·논술자동 분류