유형·난이도는 우리말 풀이가 붙은 문제는 선생님이 정했고, 나머지는 자동 분류라 다를 수 있어요. 난이도가 정해지지 않은 문제는 난이도로 거를 때 빠집니다.
536문제 · 26 / 27쪽
501.CLP-2 · 1.11절 · 32번대학 수준우리말 번역
적분 ∫1x21t1dt 를 심프슨 공식으로 어림하여 함수 logx 를 유리함수로 어림하세요. 구간 [1,3] 의 모든 x 에 대해 유리함수 f(x) 와 logx 의 오차가 0.1 이하가 되도록 하세요.
영어 원문 보기
Approximate the function logx with a rational function by approximating the integral ∫1x21t1dt using Simpson's rule. Your rational function f(x) should approximate logx with an error of not more than 0.1 for any x in the interval [1,3].
답 쓰고 채점
정답·풀이 보기
∫1xt1dt 를 심프슨 공식으로 어림하기 전에, 몇 개의 구간을 사용할지 알아야 한다. 그러려면 오차의 한계를 구해야 하고, 이는 dt4d4{t1} 의 한계를 구해야 한다는 뜻이다.
아래는 어림한 함수 f(x) 와 자연로그 함수를 같은 좌표축에 나타낸 그래프이다. 자연로그 함수는 붉은 점선으로, 어림한 함수는 푸른 실선으로 나타냈다. 어림한 함수는 작은 양수 x 에 대해 꽤 정확해 보인다.
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
Before we can take our Simpson's rule approximation of ∫1xt1dt, we need to know how many intervals to use. That means we need to bound our error, which means we need to bound dt4d4{t1}.
Now, we can find an appropriate n to ensure our error will be be less than 0.1 for any x in [1,3]:
180n4L(b−a)5180n424(x−1)5n4Because x−1≤2 for every x in [1,3], if n4>1824⋅25, then n4>1824⋅(x−1)5 for every allowed x.n4n<0.1<101>1824⋅(x−1)5>1824⋅25=3128>43128≈2.6
Since n must be even, n=4 is enough intervals to guarantee our error is not too high for any x in [1,3]. Now we find our Simpson's rule approximation with n=4, a=1, b=x, and Δx=4x−1. The points where we evaluate t1 are:
Below is a graph of our approximation f(x) and natural logarithm on the same axes. The natural logarithm function is shown red and dashed, while our approximating function is solid blue. Our approximation appears to be quite accurate for small, positive values of x.
For which values of b is the integral
∫0bx2−11dx improper?
정답·풀이 보기
b=±∞ 이면 적분 구간의 한 끝이 실수가 아니므로 이 적분은 이상적분이다.
또한 적분 구간이 무한 불연속점 x=1 과 x=−1 중 어느 하나라도 포함하면 이 적분은 이상적분이다. 적분 구간의 한 끝이 0이므로, b≥1 이거나 b≤−1 이면 이상적분이다.
아래에 x2−11 의 그래프를 그려 두었다. 다른 쪽 적분 구간의 끝이 a=0 일 때, (−1,1) 에 속하는 b 의 값만 이상적분이 되지 않는 이유를 이 그래프로 더 분명히 알 수 있다.
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
If b=±∞, then our integral is improper because one limit is not a real number.
Furthermore, our integral will be improper if its domain of integration contains either of its infinite discontinuities, x=1 and x=−1. Since one limit of integration is 0, the integral is improper if b≥1 or if b≤−1.
Below, we've graphed x2−11 to make it clearer why values of b in (−1,1) are the only values that don't result in an improper integral when the other limit of integration is a=0.
The denominator is zero when x=1, but the numerator is not, so the integrand has a
singularity (infinite discontinuity) at x=1. Let's replace the limit x=1 with a variable that creeps toward 1.
∫01x5−1x4dx=t→1−lim∫0tx5−1x4dx
To evaluate this integral we use the substitution
u=x5, du=5x4dx. When x=0 we have u=0, and when x=t
we have u=t5, so
이 극한이 발산하므로 주어진 적분은 발산한다. (두 번째 적분도 비슷한 방법으로 발산함을 보일 수 있다. 둘 중 하나만 발산해도 원래의 적분이 발산한다고 결론짓기에 충분하다.)
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
The denominator of the integrand is zero when x=−1, but the numerator is not. So, the integrand has a singularity (infinite discontinuity) at x=−1. This is the only “source of impropriety" in this integral, so we only need to make one break in the domain of integration.
Since this limit diverges, the integral diverges. (A similar argument shows
that the second integral diverges. Either one of them diverging is enough to conclude that the
original integral diverges.)
극한이 존재하지 않으므로 이 적분은 발산한다. (여기서는 두 극한이 모두 존재하지 않지만, 둘 중 하나만 존재하지 않더라도 이 적분은 발산한다.)
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
There are two “sources of impropriety": the two (infinite) limits of integration. So, we break our integral into two pieces.
∫−∞∞cosxdxThese are easy enough to antdifferentiate.=∫−∞0cosxdx+∫0∞cosxdx=a→∞lim[∫−a0cosxdx]+b→∞lim[∫0bcosxdx]=a→∞lim[sin0−sin(−a)]+b→∞lim[sinb−sin0]=DNE
Since the limits don't exist, the integral diverges. (It happens that both limits don't exist; even if only one failed to exist, the integral would still diverge.)
First, we note the integral is improper. So, we'll need to replace the top bound with a variable, and take a limit. Second, we're going to have to antidifferentiate. The integrand is the product of an exponential function, e−x, with a polynomial function, x−1, so we use integration by parts with u=x−1, dv=e−xdu, du=dx, and v=−e−x.
We see that we have two functions multiplied, but they don't simplify nicely with each other. However, if we differentiate logarithm, and integrate x2, we'll get a polynomial. So, let's use integration by parts.
u=logxdv=x2dxdu=(1/x)dxv=x3/3
First, let's antidifferentiate. We'll deal with the limits of integration later.
∫x2logxdx We use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2 to evaluate the definite integral.∫12x3logxdx=u(logx)v(x3/3))−∫v(x3/3)du(1/x)dx=31x3logx−31∫x2dx=31x3logx−31⋅31x3+C=31x3logx−91x3+C=[31x3logx−91x3]12=[3123log2−9123]−[3113log1−9113]=38log2−98−0+91=38log2−97
분모의 도함수가 분자에 나타나고 상수배만큼만 다르므로 치환을 한다. 구체적으로
u=x2−3, du=2xdx 로 치환한다.
그러면 다음을 얻는다.
∫x2−3xdx=∫udu/2=21log∣u∣+C=21logx2−3+C
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
The derivative of the denominator shows up in the numerator, only differing by a constant, so we perform a substitution. Specifically,
substitute u=x2−3, du=2xdx.
This gives
(c)
피적분함수는 서로 다른 종류의 두 함수의 곱이며, 뚜렷한 치환이나 간단히 하는 방법이 없다. logx 를 미분하면 피적분함수의 나머지 부분의 다항식 꼴과 더 잘 맞는다.
따라서 u(x)=logx, dv=x3dx 로 놓고 부분적분하면
du=x1dx 이고 v=x4/4 이다.
(a) Although a quadratic under a square root often suggests trigonometric substitution, in this case we have an easier substitution.
Specifically, let y=9+x2. Then dy=2xdx,xdx=2dy,y(0)=9, and y(4)=25.
(b)
The power of cosine is odd, so we can reserve one cosine for the differential and change the rest to sines.
Substituting y=sinx,dy=cosx, dx,y(0)=0,y(π/2)=1,cos2x=1−y2:
(c)
The integrand is the product of two different kinds of functions, with no obvious substitution or simplification. If we differentiate logx, it will match better with the polynomial nature of the rest of the integrand.
So, integrate by parts with u(x)=logx and dv=x3dx, then
du=x1dx and v=x4/4.
(b) 이 문제는 무엇을 해야 할지 바로 떠오르지는 않지만, u=logx, dv=dx 로 놓고 부분적분을 이용하여 ∫logxdx 를 구했던 것을 떠올리자. 비슷한 방법이 여기서도 통하기를 기대해 보자.
u=log(1+x2), dv=dx 로 놓고 부분적분을 하면
du=1+x22xdx, v=x 이다.
(a)
∫039−x2dx is the area of the portion of the
disk x2+y2≤9 that lies in the first quadrant. It is
41π33=49π. Alternatively,
you could also evaluate this integral using the substitution
x=3siny, dx=3cosydy.
(b) It's not immediately obvious what to do with this one, but remember we found ∫logxdx using integration by parts with u=logx and dv=dx. Let's hope a similar trick works here.
Integrate by parts, using u=log(1+x2) and dv=dx, so that
du=1+x22xdx, v=x.
(a) It doesn't matter to us right now that the arguments of sine and cosine are 2x rather than x. This is still the integral of powers of products of sines and cosines. Since cosine has an odd power, we
make the substitution u=sin(2x), du=2cos(2x)dx.
∫(x−1)(x2+1)dxTo antidifferentiate the second piece, we split it into two integrals: one that can be handled with the substitution u=x2+1, and another that looks like the derivative of arctangent.=∫[x−11/2−x2+121(x+1)]dx=∫(x−11/2−x2+1x/2−x2+11/2)dx=∫(x−11/2−41⋅x2+12x−x2+11/2)dx=21log∣x−1∣−41log(x2+1)−21arctanx+C
(d)
We know the derivative of arctangent, and it would integrate nicely if multiplied to the antiderivative of x. So, we
integrate by parts with u=arctanx and dv=xdx so that
du=1+x21dx and v=21x2. Then
(b) The denominator is an irreducible quadratic, so partial fractions can't get us any further. To integrate a function whose denominator is quadratic, we split the numerator up so that one piece can be evaluated with a u-substitution, and the other piece looks like arctangent.
(a)
If the integrand had x's instead of ex's it would be a rational function,
ripe for the application of partial fractions. So let's start by making the
substitution u=ex, du=exdx:
∫(ex+1)(ex−3)exdx=∫(u+1)(u−3)du
Now, we follow the partial fractions protocol, starting with expressing
(u+1)(u−3)1=u+1A+u−3B
To find A and B, the sneaky way, we cross multiply by the denominator
1=A(u−3)+B(u+1)
and find A and B by evaluating at u=−1 and u=3, respectively.
Hmmm. The numerator is x2−4x+4=(x−2)2. So let's make the integral look somewhat simpler by substituting u=x−2, du=dx.
When x=2 we have u=0, and when x=4 we have u=2, so:
∫x=2x=412+4x−x2x2−4x+4dx=∫u=0u=216−u2u2du
This is perfect for the trig substitution u=4sinθ,
du=4cos(θ)dθ. When u=0 we have 4sinθ=0
and hence θ=0. When u=2 we have 4sinθ=2
and hence θ=6π. So
(b)
The integrand is an even function, and the limits of integration are symmetric. So, we can slightly simplify the integral by replacing the lower limit with 0, and doubling the integral.
We'd rather not use partial fractions here, because it would be pretty complicated. Instead, notice that the numerator is only off by a constant from the derivative of x5.
Substituting x5=4y, 5x4dx=4dy,
and using that x=2⟹25=4y⟹y=8,
Solution 2: We have an integrand with x multiplied by something integrable. So, if we use integration by parts with u=x and dv=x−1dx, then du=dx (that is, the x goes away) and v=32(x−1)3/2.
We have just seen two solutions. There are other solutions too. For example, one could use the substitution u=x−1. Or, as another example, one could write
xx−1=(x−1)x−1+x−1=(x−1)3/2+(x−1)1/2
and just guess a function whose derivative is (x−1)3/2 and a function whose derivative is
(x−1)1/2.