(a) By definition,
g′(x)=h→0limhg(x+h)−g(x)=h→0limh(x+h)2−(x+h)+3−(x2−x+3)=h→0limhx2+2xh+h2−x−h+3−x2+x−3=h→0limh2xh+h2−h=h→0limhh(2x+h−1)=h→0lim(2x+h−1)=2x−1.
(b)
In the above figure, we see plots of both g and g′. We observe that the point (0.5,2.75) is the vertex of the quadratic function g, and at this point the slope of the tangent line to g(x) is zero. This aligns with the point (0.5,0) where y=g′(x) crosses the x-axis. In addition, we note that g′(x) is negative for x<0.5, which corresponds to where g is decreasing and has tangent lines with slopes that are negative. Similarly, the values of g′ are positive for x>0.5, which align with the values of slopes we see on the original function g.
(c) By definition,
p′(x)=h→0limhp(x+h)−p(x)=h→0limh5(x+h)2−4(x+h)+12−(5x2−4x+12)=h→0limh5x2+10xh+5h2−4x−4h+12−5x2+4x−12=h→0limh10xh+5h2−4h=h→0limhh(10x+5h−4)=h→0lim(10x+5h−4)=10x−4.
(d) For g(x)=x2−x+3, we found that g′(x)=2x−1. For p(x)=5x2−4x+12, we determined that p′(x)=10x−4. The constants 3 and 12 don't seem to affect the results at all, and that makes sense because those numbers only serve to shift the graphs of g and p vertically, which does nothing to change the slope. The coefficient −4 on the linear term in p(x) appears to make the “−4” appear in p′(x)=10x−4. That, too, makes sense in light of the fact that if we considered only the linear function L(x)=−4x, the slope would everywhere be −4, in contrast to the coefficent −1 found on the linear term in g(x)=x2−x+3, which leads to the constant −1 in g′(x)=2x−1. Finally, the leading coefficient 5 in (x)=5x2−4x+12 leads to the coefficient of “10” in p′(x)=10x−4. This makes sense because if we considered only y=5x2, the 5 would make the graph 5 times as steep as the graph of y=x2, and thus it affects the derivative proportionately.