Determine, with explanation, whether the series
n=1∑∞4k+3k5k converges
or diverges.
정답·풀이 보기
이 문제는 2014년 기말고사에 그대로 출제되었다. 이 급수의
nth 항이 an=4k+3k5k 이고
n 에 의존하지 않음에 주목하자! 가능성은 두 가지이다. 의도한 것이었거나(그렇다면 출제자가 특히 짓궂었던 것이다) 오타여서 원래 의도는
an=4n+3n5n 이었을 것이다. 두 경우 모두 극한
This precise question was asked on a 2014 final exam. Note that the
nth term in the series is an=4k+3k5k and does
not depend on n! There are two possibilities. Either this was
intentional (and the instructor was being particularly nasty) or it was a
typo and the intention was to have an=4n+3n5n. In both cases,
the limit
Does the following series converge or diverge?
k=1∑∞kk+11
정답·풀이 보기
이 급수의 항은 0에 가까워지므로 발산판정법을 쓸 수 없다.
수렴 여부를 추측하기 위해 다음과 같이 한다.
∑kk+11=∑k2+k1≈∑k21=∑k1이 급수가 조화급수와 비슷하게 행동한다고 추측할 수 있고, 조화급수는 발산한다(p-판정법이나 적분판정법으로 보일 수 있다). 따라서 이 급수도 발산한다고 추측한다. 그러나 이 급수를 조화급수와 직접 비교하여 발산함을 보이려면 이 급수의 항이 조화급수의 항보다 커야 하는데, 그렇지 않다. 그러므로 극한비교판정법을 쓴다.
1은 0보다 큰 실수이므로, 극한비교판정법에 의해 ∑kk+11 은 ∑k1 과 마찬가지로 발산한다.
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
The terms of the series tend to 0, so we can't use the divergence test.
To generate a guess about its convergence, we do the following:
∑kk+11=∑k2+k1≈∑k21=∑k1We guess that our series behaves like the harmonic series, and the harmonic series diverges (which can be demonstrated by p-test or integral test). So, we guess that our series diverges. However, in order to directly compare our series to the harmonic series and show our series diverges, our terms would have to be bigger than the terms in the harmonic series, and this is not the case. So, we use limit comparison.
Factorials grow super fast. Like, wow, really fast. Even faster than exponentials. So the terms are going to zero, and the divergence test won't help us. Let's use ratio–it's a good go-to test with factorials.
akak+1Since e is a constant,k→∞limakak+1=k!ek(k+1)!ek+1=ekek+1⋅(k+1)!k!=e⋅(k+1)(k)(k−1)⋯(1)k(k−1)⋯(1)=e⋅k+11=k+1e=k→∞limk+1e=0
Since 0<1, by the ratio test, the series converges.
Usually with factorials, we want to use the divergence test or the ratio test. Since the terms are indeed tending towards zero, we are left with the ratio test.
Does the following series converge or diverge?
n=1∑∞2n4+nn2+1.
정답·풀이 보기
n 이 커질 때 어림해 보자.
2n4+nn2+1≈2n4n2=2n21∑2n21 은 (p-판정법 또는 적분판정법에 의해) 수렴하는 급수이므로, 주어진 급수도 수렴할 것으로 짐작할 수 있다. 비교판정법을 쓰려면 2n4+nn2+1<2n21 임을 보여야 하는데 이는 번거로워 보이므로, 극한비교판정법을 쓰자.
극한이 양의 유한한 수이므로 극한비교판정법에 의해 ∑2n4+nn1+1 은 ∑2n21 과 같은 성질을 갖는다. 즉, 수렴한다.
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
We want to make an estimation, when n gets big:
2n4+nn2+1≈2n4n2=2n21
Since ∑2n21 is a convergent series (by p-test, or integral test), we guess that our series is convergent as well. If we wanted to use comparison test, we should have to show 2n4+nn2+1<2n21, which seems unpleasant, so let's use limit comparison.
늘 하던 대로 “쉬운" 판정법이 통하는지 먼저 살펴보자. 더하는 항들은 0으로 수렴한다.
n→∞limne−n=n→∞limnen1=0
따라서 발산판정법으로는 판정할 수 없다. 주어진 급수는 등비급수가 아니고, 등비급수와 비교하는 방법도 분명하지 않다. 그러나 더하는 항들은 적분 가능한 함수를 이룰 것처럼 보인다.
f(x)=xe−x 라 하자. x≥1 에서
이 함수는 양수이고 감소한다 (양수이면서 감소하는 두 함수 e−x 와 x1 의 곱이기 때문이다).
이 함수에 적분판정법을 쓴다.
u=x 로 치환하면
du=2x1dx 이므로 다음을 얻는다.
As usual, let's see whether the “easy" tests work. The terms we're adding converge to zero:
n→∞limne−n=n→∞limnen1=0
so the divergence test is inconclusive. Our series isn't geometric, and it doesn't seem obvious how to compare it to a geometric series. However, the terms we're adding seem like they would make an integrable function.
Set f(x)=xe−x. For x≥1,
this function is positive and decreasing (since it is the product of
the two positive decreasing functions e−x and x1).
We use the integral test with this function.
Using the substitution u=x, so that
du=2x1dx, we see that
이 존재하므로 적용할 수 있다. 급수 k=1∑∞bk 는
수렴하는 p-급수(p=67>1)이므로
주어진 급수는 수렴한다.
참고: 우리가 고른 비교 급수로 직접 비교판정법을 적용하려면, 충분히 큰 모든 k 에 대해
k5+93k4+1≤k7/61
임을 보여야 한다. 그러나 이는 성립하지 않는다. k 가 클 때는 부등호 방향이 반대인 부등식이 성립한다.
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
We first develop some intuition. For very large k,
k4 dominates 1 so that the numerator 3k4+1≈3k4=k4/3,
and k5 dominates 9 so that the denominator k5+9≈k5=k5/2 and the summand
k5+93k4+1≈k5/2k4/3=k7/61
The series n=1∑∞k7/61
converges by the p–test with p=67>1, so we expect the given series to converge too.
To verify that our intuition is correct,
we apply the limit comparison test with
exists. Since the series k=1∑∞bk is
a convergent p–series (with ratio p=67>1),
the given series converges.
Note: to apply the direct comparison test with our chosen comparison series, we would need to show that
k5+93k4+1≤k7/61
for all k sufficiently large. However, this is not true: the opposite inequality holds when k is large.
Solution 1: Let's see whether the divergence test works here.
n→∞lim(2n+7)4n42n/3(n41n41)=n→∞lim(2+7/n)42n/3=n→∞lim(2+0)42n/3=∞
The summands of our series do not converge to zero. By the divergence
test, the series diverges.
Solution 2: Let's develop some intuition for a comparison. For very large n, 2n dominates
7 so that
(2n+7)4n42n/3≈(2n)4n42n/3=1612n/3
The series n=1∑∞2n/3
is a geometric series with ratio r=21/3>1 and so diverges. (It also fails the divergence test.)
We expect the given series to diverge too.
To verify that our intuition is correct,
we apply the limit comparison test with
and since n=1∑∞n1 diverges, the given
series diverges.
(b) Since cos(nπ)=(−1)n, the given series
converges by the alternating series test.
To check that an=2nn decreases to 0 as n tends
to infinity, note that
anan+1=n2−n(n+1)2−(n+1)=(1+n1)21
is smaller than 1 (so that an+1≤an) for all n≥1,
and is smaller than 43 (so an+1≤43an)
for all n≥2.
이고 k=1∑∞k1 이 (p=1 인 p-판정법에 의해) 발산하므로, 주어진 급수는 발산한다.
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
For large k, k4≫2k3−2 and k5≫k2+k
so k5+k2+kk4−2k3+2≈k5k4=k1.
This suggests that we apply the limit
comparison test with ak=k5+k2+kk4−2k3+2 and
bk=k1.
Since
Determine whether each of the following series converge or diverge.
(a) n=2∑∞n5−nn2+n+1
(b) m=1∑∞m23m+sinm
정답·풀이 보기
(a) n 이 충분히 크면 n2≫n+1 이므로 분자 n2+n+1≈n2 이다.
n 이 충분히 크면 n5≫n 이므로 분모 n5−n≈n5 이다.
따라서 n 이 충분히 크면 n5−nn2+n+1≈n5n2=n31 이다.
이는 an=n5−nn2+n+1, bn=n31 으로 극한비교판정법을 적용해 볼 수 있음을 시사한다.
다음에서
극한이 존재하고 0이 아니며, m=1∑∞m1 은 (p=1 인 p-급수 판정법에 의해) 발산하므로 주어진 급수는 발산한다.
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
(a) For large n, n2≫n+1 and so the numerator n2+n+1≈n2.
For large n, n5≫n and so the denominator n5−n≈n5.
So, for large n, n5−nn2+n+1≈n5n2=n31.
This suggests that we apply the limit
comparison test with an=n5−nn2+n+1 and bn=n31.
Since
exists and is nonzero, and since n=1∑∞n31 converges (by the p–test with p=3>1), the given series converges.
(b) For large m, 3m≫∣sinm∣ and
so m23m+sinm≈m23m=m3.
This suggests that we apply the limit
comparison test with am=m23m+sinm and
bm=m1. (We could also use bm=m3.)
Since
First we'll develop some intuition by observing that, for very large n,
an≈2n1. We know that the series n=1∑∞n1
diverges by the p–test with p=1. So let's apply the limit comparison
test with bn=n1. Since
n→∞limbnan=n→∞lim2n−1n=n→∞lim2−n11=21
the series n=1∑∞an converges if and only if the
series n=1∑∞bn converges. So the given series
diverges.
The series in the brackets is the harmonic series which
we know diverges, by the p–test with p=1. So the series on the right
hand side diverges. By the direct comparison test, the series on the left hand
side diverges too.
(b) We'll use the ratio test with an=22n+1(2n+1).
Since
anan+1=22n+3(2n+3)(2n+1)22n+1=41(2n+1)(2n+3)=41(2+1/n)(2+3/n)→41<1 as n→∞
exists and is nonzero, and k=1∑∞k5/31 converges (by the p–test
with p=35>1), the given series converges by the limit comparison test.
(b)
The kth term in this series is
ak=(2k)!k1010k(k!)2. Factorials often work well with the ratio test, because they simplify so nicely in quotients.
As k tends to ∞, this converges to
10×1×2×21>1. So the series diverges by the
ratio test.
(c)
We'll use the integal test. The kth term in the series
is ak=k(logk)(loglogk)1=f(k) with
f(x)=x(logx)(loglogx)1, which is continuous, positive and
decreasing for x≥3.