Since the domain of arcsine is [−1,1], and we are plugging in 3x to arcsine, the values of x that we can plug in are those that satisfy −1≤3x≤1, or −3≤x≤3. So the domain of f is [−3,3].
The domain of arccosine is [−1,1], and since t2−1 is in the denominator, the domain of f requires t2−1=0, that is, t=±1. So the domain of f(t) is (−1,1).
The domain of arcsecx is ∣x∣≥1: that is, we can plug into arcsecant only values with absolute value greater than or equal to one. Since −x2−2≤−2, every real value of x gives us an acceptable value to plug into arcsecant. So, the domain of f(x) is all real numbers.
To differentiate, we use the chain rule. Remember dxd{arcsecx}=∣x∣x2−11.
따라서
arcsinx+arccosx=θ+2π−θ=2π
이므로, 우리가 계산하던 도함수는 사실 dxd{2π}=0 일 뿐이다.
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
Using formulas you should memorize from this section,
dxd{arcsinx+arccosx}=1−x21+1−x2−1=0
Remark: the only functions with derivative equal to zero everywhere are constant functions, so arcsinx+arccosx should be a constant. Since sinθ=cos(2π−θ), we can set
sinθwhere x and θ are the same in both expressions, and −2π≤θ≤2π. ThenarcsinxWe note here that arcsine is the inverse of the sine function restricted to[−2π,2π]. So, since we restricted θ to this domain, sinθ=x really does imply arcsinx=θ. (For an example of why this matters, note sin(2π)=0, but arcsin(0)=0=2π.) Similarly, arccosine is the inverse of the cosine function restricted to [0,π]. Since −2π≤θ≤2π, then 0≤(2π−θ)≤π, so cos(2π−θ)=x really does imply arccosx=2π−θ.=x=θcos(2π−θ)arccosx=x=2π−θ
So,
arcsinx+arccosx=θ+2π−θ=2π
which means the derivative we were calculating was actually just dxd{2π}=0.
참고: 또 다른 방법은 먼저 합성함수의 미분법을 이용하여 미분한 다음, 삼각형을 그려서 얻은 식을 간단히 하는 것이다.
dxd{sin(arctanx)}=1+x2cos(arctanx).
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
Let θ=arctanx. Then θ is the angle of a right triangle that gives tanθ=x. In particular, the ratio of the opposite side to the adjacent side is x. So, we have a triangle that looks like this:
where the length of the hypotenuse came from the Pythagorean Theorem. Now,
sin(arctanx)=sinθ=hypopp=x2+1x
From here, we differentiate using the quotient rule:
Remark: another strategy is to differentiate first, using the chain rule, then draw a triangle to simplify the resulting expression
dxd{sin(arctanx)}=1+x2cos(arctanx).
참고: 다른 방법으로는 먼저 연쇄 법칙(합성함수의 미분법)을 이용하여 미분한 다음, 삼각형을 그려 얻어진 식을 간단히 할 수 있다.
dxd{cot(arcsinx)}=1−x2−csc2(arcsinx).
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
Let θ=arcsinx. Then θ is the angle of a right triangle that gives sinθ=x. In particular, the ratio of the opposite side to the hypotenuse is x. So, we have a triangle that looks like this:
where the length of the adjacent side came from the Pythagorean Theorem. Now,
cot(arcsinx)=cotθ=oppadj=x1−x2
From here, we differentiate using the quotient rule:
Remark: another strategy is to differentiate first, using the chain rule, then draw a triangle to simplify the resulting expression
dxd{cot(arcsinx)}=1−x2−csc2(arcsinx).
The line y=2x+9 has slope 2, so we must find all values
of x between −1 and 1 (arcsinx is only defined for these values
of x) for which dxd{arcsinx}=2. Evaluating the derivative:
따라서 f′(x)=0 이면 cosx=0 이고, 이는 임의의 정수 n 에 대해 x=2(2n+1)π 일 때 성립한다. 이 점들이 f 의 정의역에 속하는지 확인해야 한다. 아크탄젠트는 모든 실수에서 정의되므로 코시컨트의 정의역만 확인하면 된다. x=2(2n+1)π 일 때 sinx=±1=0 이므로 cscx=sinx1 가 존재한다.
So if f′(x)=0, then cosx=0, and this happens when x=2(2n+1)π for any integer n. We should check that these points are in the domain of f. Arctangent is defined for all real numbers, so we only need to check the domain of cosecant; when x=2(2n+1)π, then sinx=±1=0, so cscx=sinx1 exists.
We approximate the function f(x)=5x. We need to centre the approximation about some value x=a such that we know f(a) and f′(a), and a is not too far from 30.
f(x)f′(x)a needs to be a number whose fifth root we know. Since 532=2, and 32 is reasonably close to 30, a=32 is a great choice.f(32)f′(32)The linear approximation of f(x) about x=32 isf(x)When x=30:f(30)=5x=x51=51x−54=55x41=532=2=5⋅241=801≈2+801(x−32)≈2+801(30−32)=2−401=4079
We estimate 530≈4079.
Remark: 4079=1.975, while 530≈1.97435. This is a decent estimation.
The linear approximation for Δy when Δx=101 isΔyThe quadratic approximation for Δy when Δx=101 isΔy≈f′(5)Δx=261⋅101=2601≈0.003846≈f′(5)Δx+21f′′(5)(Δx)2=261⋅101+21⋅262−10⋅1021=1352051≈0.003772
높이 x 미터의 절벽에서 물로 뛰어내릴 때, 물에 닿는 순간의 속력은 다음과 같이 주어진다.
s(x)=19.6xsecm
마지막 다이빙은 높이 4 미터에서 한 것이었다.
(a) Δy 의 선형 근사를 이용하여, 높이 5 미터에서 뛰어내릴 때 물에 닿는 순간 얼마나 더 빠르게 떨어질지 어림하세요.
(b) 한 다이버가 세 번 뛰어내린다. 첫 번째는 x 미터에서, 두 번째는 x+Δx 미터에서, 세 번째는 x+2Δx 미터에서 뛰어내리며, x 와 Δx 는 고정된 양수이다.
첫 번째 점프에서 두 번째 점프로 갈 때의 종단 속력의 증가량과, 두 번째 점프에서 세 번째 점프로 갈 때의 종단 속력의 증가량 중 어느 쪽이 더 큰지 구하세요.
영어 원문 보기
When diving off a cliff from x metres above the water, your speed as you hit the water is given by
s(x)=19.6xsecm
Your last dive was from a height of 4 metres.
(a) Use a linear approximation of Δy
to estimate how much faster you will be falling when you hit the water if you jump from a height of 5 metres.
(b) A diver makes three jumps: the first is from x metres, the second from
x+Δx metres, and the third from
x+2Δx metres, for some fixed positive values of x and Δx.
Which is bigger: the increase in terminal speed from the first to the second jump, or the increase in terminal speed from the second to the third jump?
정답·풀이 보기
(a)
x 가 4 근처일 때, Δy 의 선형 근사는
Δy문제에서 Δx=5−4=1 이다. 미분하면,s′(t)s′(4)선형근사에의하여Δy≈s′(4)Δx=19.6⋅2x1=x4.9,이므로=44.9≈44.9(1)≈1.1
따라서 4 미터에서 5 미터로 높이를 올리면 물에 닿는 순간의 속력은 약 1.1 미터/초 증가한다.
(b) 이번에도 선형 근사를 이용하면
Δy≈s′(a)Δx=a4.9⋅Δx
첫 두 점프 사이와 마지막 두 점프 사이의 높이 차이는 Δx 로 같다. 첫 번째 점프의 처음 높이는 두 번째 점프의 처음 높이보다 낮다. 그러므로 a 에 해당하는 값은 첫 번째 점프에서가 두 번째 점프에서보다 작다. 따라서 Δy 는 첫 두 점프 사이에서가 마지막 두 점프 사이에서보다 크다. 즉, 첫 번째 점프에서 두 번째 점프로 갈 때의 속력 증가량이 두 번째 점프에서 세 번째 점프로 갈 때의 속력 증가량보다 크다.
이를 식으로 더 나타내면, 첫 두 점프 사이의 종단 속력의 변화는
Δy한편다음두점프사이의종단속력의변화는Δy≈x4.9⋅Δx≈x+Δx4.9⋅Δx
x 와 Δx 가 양수일 때 x4.9⋅Δx>x+Δx4.9⋅Δx 이므로, 종단 속력의 변화는 첫 두 점프 사이에서가 다음 두 점프 사이에서보다 크다.
원본 교재 풀이(영어)
(a)
When x is near 4, the linear approximation of Δy is
ΔyFrom the problem, Δx=5−4=1. Differentiating,s′(t)s′(4)The linear approximation gives usΔy≈s′(4)Δx=19.6⋅2x1=x4.9, so =44.9≈44.9(1)≈1.1
So moving from 4 metres to 5 metres increases the speed with which you hit the water by about 1.1 metres per second.
(b) Again, we'll use the linear approximation
Δy≈s′(a)Δx=a4.9⋅Δx
The difference in height between the first two jumps and between the last two jumps is the same, Δx. The initial height of the first jump is smaller than the initial height of the second jump. So, the value corresponding to a is smaller for the first jump than for the second. Therefore, Δy is larger between the first two jumps than it is between the last two jumps. So, the increase in speed from the first jump to the second is larger than the increase in speed from the second jump to the third.
To put that more symbolically, the change in terminal speed between the first two jumps is
Δywhile the change in terminal speed between the next two jumps isΔy≈x4.9⋅Δx≈x+Δx4.9⋅Δx
Since x4.9⋅Δx>x+Δx4.9⋅Δx (when x and Δx are positive), the change in terminal speed is greater between the first two jumps than between the next two jumps.
If we plug in x=1 to the numerator and the denominator, we find they are both zero. So, we have an indeterminate form appropriate for L'Hopital's Rule.